Former Disney CEO Michael Eisner Endorses 'Americans Elect': "It's time for the nominating process to join the Internet age"

The primary system we use today borders on the absurd. It starts off in Iowa, a state with less than 1% of the nation’s population. The caucuses there are nonbinding and, in the case of the Democrats, don’t even use secret ballots. One week later, the attention shifts to New Hampshire, a state with less than one-half of 1% of all Americans, where the first primary is held.

The months-long process, in which votes are held in state after state, promotes one thing above all others: fundraising. And in their quest for campaign dollars, candidates end up catering to supporters with the most extreme views in that particular party and those with the biggest pocketbooks.

There is painful irony in all of this because it is taking place in an age when digital technology is making everything else in our lives more efficient, more accessible, more competitive and even more democratic.


Mitt Romney looking pretty chill 


The caucus system is fundamentally unrepresentative, disproportionately dominated by semiorganized bands of activists, and leads to low turnout.

There’s got to be a better way to pick a presidential nominee.


Gingrich is an important figure. Regardless of what happens in Florida and beyond, he will be remembered as the man who brought the Reagan Revolution to Congress. Yet it will also be recorded that Newt compared the Great Reagan to Neville Chamberlain, dismissed Reaganomics as flawed and called Reagan’s approach to the Soviet Union an utter failure a few years before the U.S.S.R. was relegated to the dustbin of history.

These unpleasant facts do not stop Newt from trying to embrace the same policies he once denounced (one wonders if he even remembers the contradictions at this point), but that’s what makes my former colleague so fascinating. And so troubling.


I mean [Newt Gingrich] was run out of the speakership by his own party, he was fined $300,000 for ethics violations. This is a guy that has had a very difficult political career at times, and has been an embarrassment to the party.

Strategic adviser? That is the oldest Washington dodge in the book. That’s because he didn’t want to register as a lobbyist. He was using his influence he obtained in public office to help them. That’s why they paid him $1.6 million. He can call it whatever he wants to call it, but that’s what it is.


Romney Support 'Collapsing' Nationally

The Gallup tracking poll showed a huge lead for Romney after winning the New Hampshire primary and it seemed that he was on the way to locking down the nomination. Now that Newt Gingrich has resurged in South Carolina, and taken the media narrative along with him, Romney is faltering nationally.

“We have seen more movement, more roller coaster kind of effect this year than any other Republican primary in our history of tracking,” Newport said. “I think anything is possible. It wouldn’t be out of the realm of possibility if Romney recovers. We’ll wait and see.”

Jon Huntsman at a packed Town Hall meeting in Keene, New Hampshire

Jon Huntsman at a packed Town Hall meeting in Keene, New Hampshire


Boston Globe Endorses Jon Huntsman: "For vision and national unity, Huntsman for GOP nominee"

With a strong record as governor of Utah and US ambassador to China, arguably the most important overseas diplomatic post, Huntsman’s credentials match those of anyone in the field. He would be the best candidate to seize this moment in GOP history, and the best-prepared to be president.


Bizarre ad from Ron Paul supporter attacks Jon Huntsman for speaking Mandarin, for adopting a Chinese daughter, and for supposedly having anti-American values.

This is probably just some rogue xenophobe, but let’s be clear: if you fuck with Jon Huntsman, you fuck with me and I am not nearly as polite and amiable as he is.


Face It: Romney’s the Nominee

The media will desperately try to persuade you there is still a Republican race. Do not pay attention.

They pick corn in Iowa, they actually pick Presidents here in New Hampshire.

For What It’s Worth: An Official Endorsement of Jon Huntsman

I frequently write about my man crush on Jon Huntsman and tonight I hope to cure my obsession by flat out endorsing his candidacy. Does my endorsement mean anything? No, but it’s 1am and I’m awake with nothing better to do.

Why then is Huntsman worthy of your vote? Allow me to summarize:

- He supports creating a Glass-Steagall Act for the 21st century. In other words, he wants new, smart regulations for banks.

- He believes that “too big too fail” is too big to exist. He wants to break up (or “right size”) the large banks responsible for 2008’s worldwide economic collapse.

- He is, by far, the most open-minded and tolerant Republican candidate on religious issues. His family recognizes the value of different faiths and he never uses religion to promote himself or to attack his opponents. 

- He believes in evolution and global warming. He has publicly criticized Republicans who reject scientific consensus on these issues. Huntsman: ”To be clear. I believe in evolution and trust scientists on global warming. Call me crazy.”

- He supports civil unions.

- He supports a gradual withdraw from Afghanistan but does not favor the “non-interventionist” philosophy of Ron Paul, which would have us heartlessly deny financial aid to people starving to death in other countries.

- He served under President Obama, demonstrating a willingness to work with Democrats for the greater good.

- He has a great sense of humor, has kids who don’t act like stiff-collared Republican zombies, and he’s adopted two kids from different countries. These are perhaps minor things, but I don’t think they are meaningless. Character and personality do count for something.

To be fair, there are more than a few things I don’t like about Huntsman’s political views. He is pro-life. However, I consider this almost a non-issues since we all know Roe v. Wade is not going to be overturned. His tax policies, while better than his Republican opponents’, are still quite conservative (meaning they favor the 1%). His statement about how “the scientific community owes us more” on global warming was stupid and ignorant. And if I may unfairly judge someone I don’t know, I think he is a bright, ethical person contending with the conservative nonsense taught to him his entire life by his father. (I admit I am entering Freudian territory here, but this is my amateur analysis).

Of course, there are many things I don’t like about Obama’s beliefs and his actual policies once in office. This does not deter me from supporting the President and hoping for the best from him. To be clear, I am not endorsing Huntsman over Obama but rather Huntsman over all the other pathetic Republican candidates. And I endorse Huntsman knowing that in the seemingly unlikely event of Huntsman winning the nomination, Obama would have a much harder time winning the general election. I endorse Huntsman for reasons that I think Huntsman himself would applaud: a sincere love of country and desire to see the very best possible candidates for both parties on the ballot. On the Republican side, Huntsman is undoubtedly the best option and I support him with all the power and influence of my little tumblr page. 


Jon Huntsman accepts Lincoln-Douglas style debate with Newt Gingrich

Although I don’t like Newt Gingrich, I would group him, along with Huntsman and Romney, as one of the three candidates with a realistic chance of winning a general election. He is also smart and experienced enough to be taken seriously. A Gingrich-Huntsman debate, therefore, could be terrific and thought-provoking.

Another great piece of news is that Huntsman will not participate in the Dec. 27 debate hosted by Donald Trump. Trump, as I obsessively wrote about when he was flirting with a campaign, is an evil, lying, sociopathic, megalomaniac who needs to be destroyed. So, good news all around from the Huntsman camp.


New York Times Says Jon Huntsman Has Best Chance of Beating Obama

Not sure how seriously one can take this, but Huntsman would obviously get the moderate and independent voters that Cain and, to a lesser extent, Romney could not.