I can’t understand how anyone might admire the Confederacy and also call themselves a libertarian. Any affinity for the Confederacy marks one very clearly as an enemy of liberty.


Anyone who cares about human liberty—to whatever degree—ought to despise the Confederacy, ought to mock and desecrate its symbols, and ought never to let Confederate apologists pass unchallenged.


Jason Kuznicki

This strongly-worded essay was written in response to this article about Jack Hunter, a close aide to Rand Paul who co-authored Paul’s 2011 book The Tea Party Goes to Washington. Hunter used to go by the moniker “Southern Avenger” and would don a mask with a Confederate flag on it while saying things like “John Wilkes Booth’s heart was in the right place.”

The mutual attraction between some libertarians and Confederate sympathizers has always baffled me. At the very least, one would expect libertarians to oppose slavery and the Confederacy while also opposing the Civil War and supporting the right of secession. (In my estimate, this view is still wrong because it allows slavery to continue unabated, indefinitely.)

Ron Paul’s assertion that slaves could have been purchased by the federal government and then set free is rather silly for a variety of reasons. For one thing, it renders the government and all taxpayers active participants in the slave trade. It also makes little business sense for a slave owner to sell a slave who would otherwise provide a lifetime of free labor. And what makes Dr. Paul think citizens would willingly allow their tax dollars to be spent on eradicating slavery? He seems to have no understanding of how most Americans felt about slavery prior to the Civil War (hint: they didn’t give a damn). Buying up all the slaves in the United States would certainly have been a long term project. It’s nearly impossible to believe that Dr. Paul’s strategy could have freed all the slaves in the same time it took Lincoln to win the Civil War and pass the 13th Amendment. One wonders if enslaved Africans would have approved of this excruciatingly slow process.

Hopefully Mr. Kuznicki’s essay expresses the consensus view of libertarians on slavery and the Civil War. Far from being a useless exercise, applying one’s ideology to historical events can reveal much about the strengths and weaknesses of that ideology.

360 Notes

  1. kfjgfsfdlk reblogged this from prettayprettaygood
  2. bebrilliantgo reblogged this from stfuconservatives
  3. marendezvous reblogged this from generalbriefing
  4. andirach reblogged this from stfuconservatives
  5. toomanyducttapetoomanyrope reblogged this from stfuconservatives
  6. hausoftrinity reblogged this from stfuconservatives
  7. transistorwithissues reblogged this from rabbleprochoice
  8. made-of-nguyen reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  9. iamcode reblogged this from stfuconservatives
  10. bigthatnoodles reblogged this from peekadora
  11. honeybeeshepherd reblogged this from stfuconservatives
  12. peekadora reblogged this from stfuconservatives
  13. rincewindsapprentice reblogged this from rabbleprochoice
  14. abbyechofang reblogged this from stfuconservatives
  15. limevodka reblogged this from rabbleprochoice
  16. carakalikimaka reblogged this from rabbleprochoice
  17. fortheunicornchild reblogged this from stfuconservatives
  18. tarmaie reblogged this from rabbleprochoice
  19. fractalresilience reblogged this from intheshadowofyggdrasil
  20. intheshadowofyggdrasil reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  21. sucha-modestmouse reblogged this from rabbleprochoice
  22. donut-queef reblogged this from rabbleprochoice
  23. ramblingmage reblogged this from rabbleprochoice
  24. wereallllmadhere reblogged this from rabbleprochoice
  25. rabbleprochoice reblogged this from sophisticated--mood--swings
  26. sophisticated--mood--swings reblogged this from stfuconservatives
  27. everything-the-heart-desires reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias